Five documentation mistakes that get fire protection submissions rejected

Five documentation mistakes that get fire protection submissions rejected

Most fire protection submissions come back not because the design is wrong, but because the evidence is missing. A pre-submission checklist.

Five documentation mistakes that get fire protection submissions rejected

In practice most submissions are returned for administrative reasons rather than a failed technical approach. These five mistakes come up again and again.

1. No design calculation statement

The drawing shows every sprinkler head but carries no flow and pressure calculation for the most remote head.

2. Datasheets that do not match the drawing

Equipment codes in the bill of quantities differ from the attached datasheets, leaving the reviewer nothing to check against.

3. Missing equipment test certificates

Fire pumps, sprinkler heads and alarm panels all need valid certificates.

4. Layouts not updated to the latest architecture

Changed partitions invalidate the sprinkler coverage areas.

5. No interlock drawings

Missing control schematics for smoke extract fans, lifts and fire doors.

Need an MEP solution for your project?

KGP engineers will survey the site, propose a technical approach and prepare a bill of quantities at no cost.

0900 000 000 Request a quote
Zalo